9 Best Claude Alternatives for Writing (#1 is Anti-AI Slop)

There's a lot of buzz around Claude, and for good reason.

I've heard from a lot of marketers, founders, and professionals who praise it for its creative and human-like writing style, and how it feels more natural than other large language models.

But ‌getting high-quality content that doesn't sound generic takes a ton of work. 

I've found that with a general-purpose tool like Claude, you're stuck building complex custom workflows and spending hours fine-tuning prompts just to get something usable for SEO, thought leadership, or bottom-of-funnel articles.

This kind of heavy lifting sometimes defeats the whole purpose of using AI to simplify things and save time. And that’s before you even run into other frustrations. 

One reviewer on Reddit put it perfectly, saying "It's super frustrating how quickly I run into my usage limits," which is especially tough during intensive writing sessions.

But regardless of the reason you’re looking for a Claude alternative, this list will help. I focused on alternatives that stand out in areas that are critical for writing content today, like output quality, specialized SEO and GEO features, and overall workflow efficiency to help you make an informed choice.

Why users look for alternatives to Claude

• You have to build complex workflows: To get high-quality results for specific tasks, you often need to become a prompt expert or set up complex automations. I’ve even heard some people doing 10-step workflows to get the quality content. From what I've seen, this involves a steep learning curve that many people just don’t have time for.
• It produces generic content: Without a lot of direction, you can end up with "AI slop." It might sound human, but it's generic and needs heavy editing to add any real point of view or expertise, which sort of defeats the purpose.
• It isn't built for specific content types: Claude is a general-purpose tool. So it isn't specifically designed for creating things like LinkedIn content or SEO or GEO articles, which means you have to do a lot more work to get an output that’s actually ready for your particular need.
• The usage limits are frustrating: The usage caps can be a major workflow killer when you’re writing long pieces of content.
• The content restrictions are too strict: The model’s heavy-handed censorship can get in the way of writing effectively. It can feel like you're walking on eggshells, with some users noting that if it weren't so censored, it would be the perfect AI writing tool.

Claude alternatives: A quick comparison

9 best Claude alternatives for writing

Let's explore some of the best alternatives out there to help you make an informed decision. 

Leaps: Best for expert-led content that avoids AI slop

Leaps is for a specific type of marketer, solopreneur, or professional: the one who refuses to publish generic AI slop. It’s built on the philosophy that you should lead the AI, not the other way around.

It’s an anti-AI slop, expert-led content platform that lets you create content that amplifies your thinking, not replaces it.

And the platform is designed for high-value content like bottom-of-the-funnel SEO/GEO articles, thought leadership articles, and LinkedIn content where human expertise is non-negotiable. The entire workflow is human-led and AI-assisted.

This approach avoids those complex, 20-step AI content workflow setups you see all over LinkedIn and solves the popular AI hallucination problem with a real-time research assistant. 

A Leaps user puts it this way: "They're both written in my voice and are better than anything I've seen other AI tools do.".

Key features of Leaps

• Journalist-style interviews: It uses a unique POV capture workflow, asking deep, thoughtful questions to pull out your best insights, experiences, and ideas from you or your subject matter experts.
• AI research assistant: This feature scans the web live to gather accurate, real-time data for SEO and GEO content. It presents the research to you for your direction and POV, solving the hallucination problem before it writes the content.
• Voice-to-text input: Makes it incredibly easy for you or your busy experts to share their knowledge just by speaking. It also helps the AI analyze and capture their authentic voice.
• Expert-led outlines, articles: It automatically combines expert answers and research into a suggested content structure and a final draft that takes you 80-90% of the way. 
• Expert-led content in multiple formats: You can create LinkedIn posts, thought leadership articles, SEO & GEO content, newsletters, quotes and tweets from your insights captured. 
• Saved writing style: You can give Leaps sample articles or save a specific writing style, which helps make sure all the content it generates is consistent and actually sounds like your brand.

Pros of using Leaps

• It creates high-quality, differentiated content that avoids the generic feel of "AI slop."
• It amplifies and scales your or your team's human expertise rather than trying to replace it.
• The workflow is simple and easy to use, without complex setups or a steep learning curve.
• It avoids AI hallucinations and heavy fact-checking with its real-time research assistant.
• It streamlines how you collaborate with your SMEs, making it easy to capture their insights for content.
• The content it produces gets you 80-90% of the way there, which significantly reduces heavy editing time.
• It focuses on creating content that sounds like you, not just vaguely "human-sounding."
• Built for both SEO and the new era of search (GEO) by focusing on expertise and helpfulness.

Cons of using Leaps

• It requires more initial input than "one-click" AI generators that focus purely on speed.
• As a specialized tool for expert-led content, it may be less suited for users who just need a general-purpose AI for a wide variety of non-writing tasks.

Pricing for Leaps

• BASIC: $49/month
• PRO: $99/month
• PREMIUM: $149/month
• You can get a 20% discount with an annual plan.
• Offers a 14-day free trial with no credit card required.

Related: How to use AI for SEO content writing (without breaking quality)

ChatGPT: The all-purpose writing assistant, best for idea generation

ChatGPT is like the ultimate jack-of-all-trades. It's a fantastic all-purpose assistant, but when it comes to writing, its greatest strength is in idea generation.

It's perfect for marketers who need to speed up the brainstorming process, explore some creative angles, or draft shorter pieces of content that don't need a lot of context.

The catch is that if you want really high-quality written content from it, you have to be prepared to invest a lot of time. This means setting up complex workflows or building your own custom GPTs. If you don't, you can end up with generic content that hallucinates and needs a ton of heavy editing.

One Reddit user summed it up well, saying they see it as "a way to speed up the brainstorming process and potentially take me in directions my own mind wouldn't have gotten me as quickly."

Key features of ChatGPT

• Custom GPTs: You can create personalized versions of ChatGPT for specific tasks, which helps improve the quality and consistency of your outputs.
• Conversational text generation: It enables a natural back-and-forth dialogue that's really effective for refining your ideas and iterating on drafts.
• Advanced voice mode: This feature lets you dictate messy first drafts and then use the AI as an editorial assistant to clean them up, which can really speed things up.
• AI image generation: It can generate images from text prompts, which is useful for creating supporting visuals for your content.
• Access to state-of-the-art AI models: It gives you cutting-edge capabilities for a huge range of text generation tasks, from creative writing to technical analysis.

Pros of using ChatGPT

• Excellent for overcoming writer's block and generating initial ideas quickly.
• Acts as a highly versatile "jack-of-all-trades" for various writing tasks.
• Provides an intuitive conversational interface for exploring and refining concepts.
• Allows for highly specialized and repeatable workflows with Custom GPTs.
• Offers a convenient voice mode to capture thoughts and create rough drafts.

Cons of using ChatGPT

• Getting high-quality written content often requires custom and complex workflows and advanced prompt engineering.
• Without significant direction, it can produce generic "AI slop" that needs heavy editing.
• It's prone to factual inaccuracies (hallucinations), so you'll need to do thorough fact-checking.
• It may lose context or forget instructions during long-form content generation.

Pricing for ChatGPT

• Free: $0/month
• Plus: $20/month
• Pro: $200/month
• Business (Team): $30/user/month
• Enterprise: Contact sales

Gemini: The Google ecosystem powerhouse

I've personally tried Gemini for creative writing, and it's pretty good. I'd position it as Google’s ecosystem powerhouse. Its biggest advantage is its seamless integration with Google apps like Docs and Gmail, which is a massive workflow win if you're already living in that world.

It’s also a great choice if you’re looking for a strong creative writing partner that produces natural, human-sounding writing.

As one user noted, "The writing Gemini produces just sounds very natural and human... it's very hard to get actually usable output for anything that resembles professional creative writing [from other tools]."

But I think we need to be careful. The goal shouldn't just be "human-sounding" content. Even though Gemini’s writing sounds natural, it can still be generic and lack a real human point of view if you don't guide it carefully.

Key features of Gemini

• Integration with Google apps: It brings AI assistance directly into Docs, Gmail, and Slides for a streamlined workflow.
• Deep research feature: It uses Google Search to create comprehensive reports by analyzing and synthesizing multiple web sources.
• Expanded context window: It can process and remember large amounts of information, which improves coherence in long documents.
• Ability to analyze large documents: You can upload extensive files to have it summarize and extract key insights.
• Access to advanced AI models: It taps into powerful models like Gemini Pro for high-quality, nuanced responses.

Pros of using Gemini

• Integrates deeply and seamlessly with Google's suite of apps (Docs, Gmail, etc.).
• Excels at producing creative writing that sounds natural and human-like.
• Embeds powerful, real-time research capabilities via Google Search.
• Its large context window is helpful for maintaining coherence in long-form content.
• It's very user-friendly for anyone already familiar with the Google environment.

Cons of using Gemini

• Human-sounding output can still feel generic and be devoid of authentic human experience or POV.
• It can lead you to outsource your thinking to the AI rather than amplifying your own ideas.
• It may require complex prompt engineering or automation setups with other tools for specific content needs beyond general writing.

Pricing for Gemini

• Free: $0/month
• Google AI Pro: $19.99/month
• Google AI Ultra: $249.99/month
• Google AI Pro comes with a 1-month free trial.

Microsoft Copilot: The corporate knowledge expert

Microsoft Copilot is like your corporate knowledge expert. Its most unique strength is its ability to connect to and reason over your company's internal data, like operations manuals, emails, and other documents.

It's best for business users who are already deeply embedded in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem and need to streamline internal communications.

For example, if you need to draft a report based on three different internal strategy docs, Copilot can be very helpful. One Reddit user shared, "I used it today by feeding in an operations manual and asking it to provide a requirements document... It was amazing."

But, you have to realize that the content it drafts can be very generic and robotic. To make it useful for anything beyond basic internal comms, you'll have to do a lot of heavy editing and add your own insights to make it sound natural.

As another user on Reddit said, “t seems it's only really able to generate draft text for documents and emails. But these are always so generic, dumb, and pointless that one has to spend just as much time rewriting it.”

Key features of Microsoft Copilot

• Analysis of internal documents: You can feed it specific corporate materials to generate accurate, context-aware documents.
• Integration with Microsoft 365 apps: It brings AI capabilities directly into tools like Word, Outlook, and Teams.
• Document summarization: It quickly digests long documents, emails, and meeting transcripts to give you concise summaries.
• Presentation creation: It can help you build presentations by generating text and visuals based on your prompts.
• Email drafting & management: It helps write professional emails and can even scan, categorize, and summarize your unread messages.

Pros of using Microsoft Copilot

• Integrates deeply into the Microsoft 365 suite (Word, Outlook, Teams).
• Great at analyzing and reasoning over your company's internal data.
• Streamlines corporate communication tasks like drafting emails and reports.
• Can automate tasks and draft content directly within your existing workflows.
• Useful for summarizing long documents and creating presentations.

Cons of using Microsoft Copilot

• Generated content can be generic, robotic, and sound unnatural.
• Requires heavy editing to infuse human insight and a natural tone.
• Less suited for external-facing marketing content that requires a unique brand voice.

Pricing for Microsoft Copilot

• Copilot: $0/month
• Personal: $9.99/month
• Family: $12.99/month
• Premium: $19.99/month
• Copilot Business: $33.50 user/month, paid yearly
• Copilot Business: $30.30/user/month, paid yearly
• Enterprise Copilot: $30/month
• Copilot Studio: Offers Pay-as-you-go and pre-purchase plans

Jasper: Best for rapidly creating marketing assets with templates

Jasper is an AI marketing platform, and for me, its biggest sell is helping marketers go from an idea to a first draft almost instantly.

If you need to produce a high volume of structured content, like blog posts, ads, or case studies, and speed is your top priority, Jasper can help with that.

But there's a trade-off you need to be aware of. This focus on speed comes from an AI-led workflow, which often means you sacrifice quality. The writing ends up being generic and lacking real expertise.

You should expect to perform heavy editing to inject your brand's POV and fix the robotic tone. A user review highlights this perfectly; he says the templates "can be a huge time-saver," but also notes that the writing often "felt cold and formulaic."

Key features of Jasper

• Variety of templates: It offers structured starting points for dozens of marketing tasks, designed to accelerate the creation of first drafts.
• Brand voice & Brand IQ: It learns and applies your specific tone and messaging across all content to maintain brand consistency.
• SEO mode: It integrates with tools like Surfer SEO to help you optimize content for search engines directly within your writing workflow.
• Jasper Studio: This feature lets business users build custom, no-code AI applications tailored to their specific needs.
• Jasper Canvas: It provides a collaborative workspace for teams to brainstorm ideas and create content together in a flexible, document-style editor.

Pros of using Jasper

• Great at producing a wide variety of marketing assets quickly.
• Its vast library of templates helps you get from idea to first draft almost instantly.
• Brand voice features help maintain a consistent tone across your content.
• Direct integration with SEO tools simplifies the optimization process.
• Offers features for team collaboration and building custom AI tools.

Cons of using Jasper

• The focus on speed often comes at the expense of content quality.
• Its AI-led workflow produces generic writing that lacks human expertise and POV.
• The output typically requires heavy editing to sound authentic and less formulaic.
• Jasper Studio can have a steep and complex learning curve for non-technical users.

Pricing for Jasper

• Pro: $69/month
• Business: Custom pricing is available.
• Jasper offers a 7-day free trial for the Pro plan.

Related:

• 11 Jasper Alternatives (#1 Writes Zero AI Slop)
• Jasper AI Pricing, Features, & Reviews: Is It Worth It?
• Jasper vs. Copy.ai vs. Leaps: Which AI Writer Is Best for You?

Grok: Best for real-time research

I'd position Grok as the "Up-to-the-Minute AI." Its core strength is real-time search access, which makes it the best choice for writing about current events, trending topics, or anything that requires the absolute latest information.

It completely solves the "knowledge cut-off" problem you see in other models.

While it’s excellent for research, I have to warn you that using Grok for the actual writing can be a different story. It can produce that generic AI content that we all want to avoid, so you’ll likely need to do some significant editing to get it up to par.

It's a fantastic research assistant, but maybe not the best ghostwriter if you’re not prepared to do heavy editing.  

Key features of Grok

• Real-time search & information access: It pulls live data directly from the web to provide the most current information.
• DeepSearch for web research: It conducts thorough analysis across the web for research-heavy writing tasks, going beyond a simple search.
• A 'think' feature for problem-solving: This is a specialized mode designed to reason through complex problems step-by-step.
• Engaging, motivational tone: It often interacts more like a collaborative partner, providing encouragement along the way.
• PDF & document understanding: It can analyze uploaded documents to answer questions and incorporate that information into its responses.

Pros of using Grok

• Accesses live, up-to-the-minute web data.
• Avoids the outdated information problem common in other AI models.
• Offers specialized features like DeepSearch and Thinking Mode for in-depth research.
• User reviews praise its intuitive, guide-like interaction style.
• Excellent for gathering information on current events and trending topics.

Cons of using Grok

• Can produce generic, robotic "AI slop" if used for the actual writing part.
• Content generated by Grok will often require heavy editing to meet quality standards.

Pricing for Grok

• Basic: Free
• SuperGrok: $30/month
• SuperGrok Heavy: $300/month
• Offers a 16% discount with an annual plan.
• Grok Business: $30.00/seat/month
• Enterprise: Contact sales.

Copy.ai: The go-to-market toolkit

Copy.ai is a Go-to-Market AI platform. It's designed for marketing teams that need to rapidly generate a high volume of content across the entire funnel, from social posts and ad copy to landing pages and sales emails.

Its main focus is speed. But like I always say, that speed comes at a cost.

The AI-led process often results in generic content that needs heavy editing to feel authentic. It's probably not your best bet for high-quality long-form content.

Also, I've noticed that many of its best go-to-market features are locked behind expensive enterprise plans. A Copy.ai reviewer said, "Of course it needs editing but you'll never have blank page syndrome again."

Key features of Copy.ai

• 90+ copywriting tools & templates: It provides a huge library of specialized tools for specific marketing and sales copy needs.
• Workflow automation: It helps automate repetitive content tasks to let you scale your go-to-market execution.
• Infobase for factual accuracy: You can input key facts and data to help make sure the generated content is accurate and on-message.
• Brand voice: This feature aims to make sure all generated copy aligns with your established brand personality.
• First draft wizard tool: It allows you to quickly generate entire blog posts from just a few inputs.

Pros of using Copy.ai

• Helps create a wide variety of content for the entire GTM funnel.
• Focuses on speed, allowing you to get from idea to first draft very quickly.
• Offers workflow automation to help scale your content creation.
• The Infobase feature helps maintain factual accuracy in its outputs.
• Praised by users for breaking writer's block and generating initial ideas efficiently.

Cons of using Copy.ai

• The AI-led process leads to generic writing that requires heavy editing.
• Prioritizing speed often means sacrificing content quality.
• The most valuable GTM features are locked in expensive enterprise plans.
• Might not be the most-suited for creating high-quality, long-form content.

Pricing for Copy.ai

• Self-serve: $29/month
• Enterprise: custom pricing
• Offers a 20% savings with annual billing.

Related:

• 9 Copy.ai Alternatives for SEO and GEO Content
• Copy.ai vs. Leaps: Which One Produces Better Content Quality?

Writesonic: Best for the all-in-one GEO content lifecycle

I'd frame Writesonic as the all-in-one SEO/GEO content platform. 

It’s designed for marketers and content teams who want a single tool to manage their entire SEO and GEO workflow, from initial strategy to tracking performance in AI search.

The platform has some great GEO features, including an AI visibility tracker and brand visibility optimizer that I think is particularly useful. 

But, since the writing process is AI-led, you'll have to manually infuse your own expertise and POVs for the content to actually be helpful and rank.

You should also expect to do heavy editing to remove robotic language and those classic "AI tells." Users seem to like the workflow, with one reviewer noting they "found it fast, accurate, and consistent." while another user said that “it had that AI stiffness I just can't unsee anymore”

Key features of Writesonic

• AI visibility tracking: A standout feature that I find really important; it helps you monitor how your brand and content are performing on AI search platforms like ChatGPT.
• Content optimizer: This gives you tools and suggestions to improve the SEO score of your existing content.
• SEO AI agent: A specialized tool designed to create SEO/GEO-optimized articles and blog posts.
• AI-powered content strategy: This assists in developing a content plan based on keyword analysis and topic research.
• Multi-format generation: It can create a wide variety of content types, including blog posts, social media posts, ad copy, and email copy.

Pros of using Writesonic

• Covers the complete SEO/GEO content lifecycle, from strategy to performance tracking.
• Users praised it for being easy to use.
• Helps you optimize your existing content for SEO and GEO.
• Lets you track your content's visibility and performance in AI search.
• Users have found it to be fast, accurate, and consistent for various projects.

Cons of using Writesonic

• The writing process is AI-led, requiring you to manually infuse your expertise and POVs.
• Content often requires heavy editing to remove robotic-sounding language and "AI tells."
• It prioritizes speed, which can result in a sacrifice of content quality.

Pricing for Writesonic

• Lite: $49/month
• Standard: $99/month
• Professional: $249/month
• Advanced: $499/month
• Enterprise: Custom Pricing
• Writesonic offers a free trial, with no credit card required.

QuillBot: Best for rephrasing & refining existing text

When I think of QuillBot, I see it as a rephrasing tool. Its core strength is helping all kinds of writers, from students to marketing professionals, refine existing text.

It’s perfect if you need to improve clarity, find a better way to say something, or avoid plagiarism. Its paraphraser, synonym slider, and grammar checker can be particularly helpful.

It's great for what it does, but it's not a content generator in the same way as the other tools on this list. Think of it more as a powerful editor's assistant.

You bring it a draft, and it helps you polish it. One Reddit user commented, "The Synonym slider is clutch. You can control how much it changes your text." 

But note that “once you switch to Creative or Suggestive modes, the sentences start reading like they were written by a robot trying to sound poetic.” 

Key features of QuillBot

• Paraphraser: Its core feature rewrites sentences, paragraphs, or entire articles in different ways to improve clarity and style.
• Synonym slider: This is a highly-praised feature that lets you control the degree of change in the paraphrased text, from minor tweaks to major rewrites.
• Grammar checker: This helps you catch and correct grammatical errors to improve the overall quality of your writing.
• Citation generator: It simplifies the process of creating accurate citations, which is important for academic and research-based writing.
• AI humanizer: This is a tool designed to make AI-generated text sound more natural and less robotic.

Pros of using QuillBot

• Excellent for rephrasing and improving the clarity of existing content.
• Helps you avoid accidental plagiarism by offering alternative phrasing.
• The Synonym slider gives you fine-tuned control over the extent of the changes.
• Useful for a broad audience, including students, academics, and professional writers.
• Offers a suite of tools beyond paraphrasing, like a grammar checker and citation generator.

Cons of using QuillBot

• Text that has been paraphrased, even from a human source, may be flagged by AI detectors.
• It’s primarily a tool for refining existing text, not for generating new long-form content from scratch.
• The paraphrase content can still sound generic.

Pricing for QuillBot

• Free: $0/month
• Premium: $4.17/month (billed annually).
• Team Plan: Contact sales for details.

Frequently asked questions about Claude alternatives

Let's break down some of the common things users ask when they're looking for a Claude alternative for writing.

Is Claude better than ChatGPT for writing?

Honestly, it really depends on what you're trying to write. I’ve heard from many marketers saying Claude’s writing feels more human-like, which is great for long-form content.

But I've also had great experiences using ChatGPT-4 for creative writing tasks. The bottom line is that neither tool is a magic button. You still have to do a lot of work prompting and directing it.

What should I look for in a Claude alternative for writing?

When you're choosing an alternative, I believe you should look for tools with human-led workflows. The AI should be your assistant, not the one in charge.

Look for a tool that's simple to set up and use. The best tools I've found allow you to save your brand voice and writing style for consistency.

And most importantly, you want something that gets you 80-90% of the way there, so you aren't spending hours on heavy edits. If you have to rewrite everything, what's the point?

Which AI writer is best for long-form content?

This comes down to your philosophy on content. If you're like me and refuse to publish AI slop, I'd say Leaps is the best option.

It’s built around a human-led process that amplifies your expertise and POV, which helps you avoid hallucinations and create content that’s actually in your voice.

But if you prioritize speed and are comfortable with complex prompts, a general-purpose tool like ChatGPT or Gemini could work. Just know that you'll likely have to do a lot more editing.

How can I avoid my writing sounding like generic "AI slop"?

The best way to avoid AI slop is to choose a tool that's built on a human-led, AI-assisted philosophy. You need to be the one leading the process.

This means your expertise, experiences, and point of view are the foundation of the content, not an afterthought you try to edit in later.

Use a tool like Leaps that has a workflow to pull insights from you or your team's subject matter experts first. That's how you create content that's genuinely differentiated.

Choosing the right Claude alternative for your needs

When you're picking a Claude alternative, you’re not just choosing a tool; you're choosing a content philosophy. I believe the decision comes down to one key question: Do you want AI to lead, or do you want to lead AI?

Many tools are built for speed. They’re AI-led, meaning they can get a first draft done instantly. But that speed often comes at the cost of quality, leaving you with generic content that needs heavy editing which  is a huge problem.

On the other hand, there's a human-led approach. I believe that AI should be an assistant, not the one in charge. 

The goal isn't just to create "human-sounding" content, because that can still be generic. You want content that sounds like you. So whatever tool you pick, choose the one that will help you do that.

Related:

• 12 AI Content Writing Tools For SEO & GEO Content 
• Best AI LinkedIn Post Generators (Prices, Reviews, Features, & More)
• 9 AI Tools for LinkedIn to Boost Your Content, Marketing, and Sales