11 Jasper Alternatives (#1 Writes Zero AI Slop)

It's fair to say Jasper was a pioneer in the AI writing landscape. 

For a while, it was the go-to tool for marketers and founders looking to speed up content creation. 

But as the AI market has matured, I’ve seen a big shift.

Many users are now looking for alternatives because they’re no longer satisfied with Jasper’s content quality, and the high cost is getting harder to justify.

One user on G2 mentioned, "The output quality was very very bad," and another warned that "fact-checking is a must before using its outtake."

This is a huge issue, especially when you're creating SEO and GEO content. Because getting a draft that requires you to spend hours fact-checking and injecting a real point of view defeats the purpose of using AI in the first place. 

That is why I have put together this list. I focused on alternatives that stand out in areas that are critical for marketers and founders today, like output quality, specialized SEO and GEO features, and overall workflow efficiency to help you make an informed choice.

Why Users Look for Alternatives to Jasper

• Inconsistent output quality: Users report that the content Jasper generates can be poor and requires significant rework, with one user stating, "The output quality was very very bad." (G2 Review)
• Requires heavy fact-checking: The content can be factually inaccurate or misleading, forcing users to spend extra time verifying information. A reviewer noted, "Fact-checking is a must before using its outtake." (G2 Review)
• High cost for value provided: Given the issues with content quality, many users feel the price is too high and "the cost for it is hard to justify." (G2 Review)
• Doesn’t follow brand voice: Jasper struggles to consistently match a specific brand voice, with one user noting they switched to another tool because it "could follow our brand voice perfectly" after Jasper failed to do so. (G2 Review)
• Rise of specialized niche tools: The AI market has matured, and specialized tools now outperform Jasper in specific areas like deep SEO, expert-led content creation, and enterprise-grade brand governance. 

A Quick Look: Comparing the Top 11 Jasper Alternatives

11 Powerful Jasper Alternatives for SEO and GEO content

Now, we’ll take a closer look at each of these 11 tools, breaking down their key features, ideal use cases, and what makes them a strong alternative to Jasper for your specific needs.

Leaps: Best for expert-led SEO/GEO content that avoids AI slop

If you’re tired of generic AI content that hallucinates facts and requires heavy editing, Leaps is particularly built for you.

Built on the belief that AI should amplify your thinking, not replace it, it’s designed as an expert-led AI content platform for marketers and founders who refuse to publish AI slop and want to lead with their own unique point of view.

This tool is for you if you need to create authoritative content that drives high-intent traffic from both SEO and GEO. 

The entire workflow is human-led but AI-assisted, focusing on capturing real expertise from you or your subject matter experts (SMEs). This process ensures your content is differentiated and not just a copycat of what’s already ranking on Google.

For me, two features really stand out. First, the AI research assistant tackles the huge problem of hallucinations in AI content by pulling live, accurate data from the web. This is a massive time-saver for research-heavy articles like product listicles or comparisons.

Second, the workflow itself is designed to capture and highlight your unique angle, which is essential for creating content that ranks, stays ranked, and shows up in AI search.

As a Leaps user put it, ""It did an outstanding job of capturing the top nine insights that I had. I was actually impressed with the tone. And I think it did an excellent job of matching the insights."

Leaps pros: authenticity and accuracy

• Captures expert insights via AI-powered interviews (voice or text) to form the foundation of your content.
• AI research assistant pulls from live data, providing accurate, up-to-date research and eliminating hallucinations.
• Creates differentiated content outlines for SEO/GEO based on your unique POV, not just a copycat of what's already ranking.
• Follows a human-led editorial workflow (research -> POV -> outline -> draft) that amplifies, rather than replaces, human thinking.
• AI writing assistant writes human-like research backed SEO/GEO content that’s in your voice and based on your POV.
• Reduces the need for heavy editing and fact-checking common with other AI writers.
• Built for both SEO and the new era of search (GEO) by focusing on expertise and helpfulness.

Leaps Cons: Potential Drawbacks

• Not created for users who want to auto-generate hundreds of SEO articles with no human input.
• Mostly focused on content creation, not full stack marketing with analytics, etc.

Pricing for Leaps

• BASIC: $49/month for 3 expert-led SEO/GEO outlines & articles
• PRO: $99/month for 7 expert-led SEO/GEO outlines & articles
• PREMIUM: $149/month for expert-led 15 SEO/GEO outlines & articles
• Custom Plan: Custom pricing
• Offers a 20% savings with annual billing.
• Includes a 14-day free trial, no credit card required.

Frase: Best for SEO/GEO research and content briefing

If you're a content strategist or part of an SEO team, you know the pain of manually analyzing top-ranking pages to build a content brief. Frase is designed to eliminate that work.

It’s the ultimate SEO research and briefing tool for creating comprehensive, competitor-aware outlines quickly.

Frase is excellent at streamlining the research process, helping you build data-driven content briefs that have a better chance of ranking. 

Beyond traditional SEO, it also has newer GEO features designed to help your content get cited by AI search engines, which is becoming increasingly important. 

It’s a complete workflow that takes you from deep SERP research to writing and optimization, all in one place.

As one user noted on G2, "My favorite feature is building article outlines. It allows me to see what ranking articles are doing at a glance and structure our content logically."

Key pros of using Frase

• Automates SERP analysis to build comprehensive content briefs in minutes.
• Excellent for structuring content logically based on top-ranking competitor data.
• Provides deep research and optimization features for a complete workflow from research to writing.
• Real-time content scoring helps improve on-page SEO.
• Features emerging GEO capabilities to help content get cited by AI platforms.
• The AI writer is cited as a productivity boost that doesn't sound robotic.

Potential cons of Frase

• Many users on Trustpilot complain about their bad customer service.
• Some users say the content quality isn’t better than what you’d get from chatGPT.

Pricing for Frase

• Starter: $45/month
• Professional: $115/month
• Scale: $229/month
• Advanced: $349/month
• Offers a 15% savings with annual billing.
• Offers a 7-day money-back guarantee, and no credit card is required to start.

Copy.ai: Best for GTM Workflow Automation

Copy.ai has evolved from its early days. It’s no longer just a content generator; it's now an AI-powered Go-To-Market (GTM) platform built for automating complex workflows across marketing and sales teams.

You can think of it less as a simple writer and more as an engine for your entire GTM strategy.

It's best for teams that need to automate multi-step processes like inbound lead qualification or personalized sales outreach. 

A workflow could let you automatically enrich a new lead's data, use an AI agent to draft a custom email based on their industry, and add them to a specific campaign, all without manual intervention.

One of the standout features for me is its access to multiple LLMs. From my own experience using AI for content, I’ve seen that one model might be better for a specific type of content or copy than another. Having that choice is a big plus.

However, you have to be cautious. To get high-quality output and avoid AI slop, you need to maintain human oversight and control. And this workflow could mean having to do heavy editing and fact checking.

The results can be impressive when managed well. As Copy.ai user mentioned, "Thanks to Copy.ai, we're generating 5x more meetings with our personalized, AI-powered GTM strategy."

Key pros of using Copy.ai

• Automates multi-step marketing and sales workflows.
• Deploys AI agents to handle specific, repeatable tasks.
• Connects to internal data sources to enrich and act upon information.
• Offers flexibility with access to multiple LLMs (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic), allowing users to choose the best model for a given task.
• Maintains brand consistency with a dedicated brand voice feature.
• Unifies data to create a single source of truth for GTM activities.

Potential cons of Copy.ai

• Output quality can be inconsistent and requires human oversight and control.
• Without careful management, automated outputs risk becoming generic "AI slop."
• Its focus has shifted more towards larger teams and enterprise use cases.

Pricing for Copy.ai

• Chat: $29/month
• Agent: $249/month
• Enterprise: custom pricing
• Offers a 20% savings with annual billing.

Related:

• 9 Copy.ai Alternatives for SEO and GEO Content
• Copy.ai vs. Leaps: Which One Produces Better Content Quality?

Claude: Best for creative writers seeking natural, human-like content

If your top priority is a conversational flow for tasks like brainstorming or creative writing, Claude acts as an excellent creative partner. People usually praise it for producing writing that feels less stilted.

And for anyone creating long-form SEO and GEO content, Claude's large context window is another standout feature. 

It's useful for analyzing extensive documents, like transcripts from interviews with subject matter experts or internal customer research data, which are gold mines for creating authoritative content.

But there's a trade-off. Because it’s a general model, it’s not specifically designed for a content workflow out of the box. 

You will need to invest time in learning how to prompt it effectively and potentially setting up custom workflows to get it to produce high-quality, on-brand content.

Claude's key pros

• Produces human-like, and conversational writing.
• Large context window is ideal for analyzing extensive documents like customer research, transcripts, and reports.
• A strong creative partner for tasks like brainstorming and drafting initial ideas.
• Capable of adapting to and matching a specific user's tone of voice.

Claude's potential cons

• Not specifically designed for a dedicated SEO or GEO content workflow.
• Requires significant user effort to learn prompting and set up custom workflows for high-quality, on-brand content.
• Lacks the specialized, built-in SEO features found in other tools.

Pricing for Claude

• Free forever: $0/month
• Individual Pro: $20/month
• Individual Max: Starts at $100/month
• Team Standard: $25/person/month
• Team Premium: $150/person/month
• Enterprise: custom pricing
• 17% savings with annual billing for individual plans

Rytr: Best for budget-friendly, short-form content

Rytr is a great quick-start tool if you need a budget-friendly AI writer for everyday content tasks.

It’s perfect if you’re a solopreneur, blogger, or small team who needs to generate short-form content like social media posts, ad copy, and product descriptions without a steep learning curve or a big investment. 

One user on G2 praised it for its affordability, saying “I find Rytr incredibly valuable because it is free, which makes it accessible and budget-friendly.” 

They claim to be the ultimate utility tool, offering over 40 use cases and a browser extension that lets you use it anywhere on the internet.

It also supports over 30 languages and includes useful SEO features for generating meta titles and descriptions, which can be a real time-saver.

Another thing that stands out for me is their built-in plagiarism checker. Back when I was a managing editor at an agency, I had to use a separate tool to check our writers' work. 

So having that feature integrated directly into the platform is incredibly helpful, especially for anyone who works with external writers or needs to ensure content originality.

Rytr pros

• Extremely budget-friendly, making it accessible for individuals and small teams.
• Versatile with over 40 different use cases and templates.
• Easy to get started with and framed as a "quick start" tool.
• Includes a convenient browser extension to use its features across the web.
• Features a built-in plagiarism checker to help ensure content originality.
• Supports content generation in over 30 languages.
• Includes basic, time-saving SEO features for meta titles and descriptions.

Rytr cons

• Primarily focused on short-form content so may be less robust for complex, long-form articles.
• SEO capabilities are not as deep or strategic as specialized SEO writing platforms.

Pricing for Rytr

• Free forever: $0/month
• Unlimited: $9/month
• Premium: $29/month
• Get 2 months free with an annual plan.

Writesonic: Best for all-in-one search visibility (SEO & GEO)

Search is no longer just about ranking on Google. It’s also about showing up in AI models like ChatGPT. And Writesonic is an all-in-one platform built for this new reality.

It’s ideal for marketers who want to manage both traditional SEO and emerging Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) from a single dashboard.

What I find important here is that Writesonic doesn't just help you track your brand's visibility in AI search, it also helps you find gaps and optimize for it. This is a key differentiator.

The platform includes tools for tracking AI mentions and citations, as well as an SEO checker and site audits to cover all your bases.

It’s helpful if you’re trying to not just rank on Google but also improve their brand's visibility in AI search. 

As a G2 reviewer explains, "I really wanted to see how brands are being mentioned in AI answers... But for me, SEO was also a priority. I didn't want to invest in multiple tools or complicate my process and that's why I really love Writesonic."

But some users say the output can feel unnatural. One Reddit user said, the text was well-structured but "had that AI stiffness I just can't unsee anymore."

Writesonic pros

• Offers AI search tracking to monitor brand visibility and citations in AI chat engines.
• Includes SEO Site Audits with AI-powered recommendations for fixes.
• Provides a comprehensive suite of tools for both SEO and GEO in one platform.
• Combines content creation, strategy, and optimization features.
• Features Chatsonic, a specialized AI chat assistant trained on marketing and SEO data.
• Helps users track key GEO metrics like AI mentions, citations, and sentiment.

Writesonic cons

• Generated content can sound stiff, formal, or unnatural.
• The AI output tends to overuse generic phrases and needs heavy editing.

Pricing for Writesonic

• Lite: $49/month
• Standard: $99/month
• Professional: $249/month
• Advanced: $499/month
• Enterprise: Custom pricing
• Offers both monthly and annual billing, with an approximate 20% discount for annual payments. 
• Free trial available, no credit card required.

Scalenut: Best for rapid first drafts

Scalenut is framed as the effortless article creator and the fastest way to get a first draft. 

Its 'Cruise Mode' feature automates the creation of a full-length, SERP-backed article in just a few minutes and lets you produce content at a high velocity. As Scalenut user says, "The keyword grouping is spot on, and Cruise Mode makes AI content creation effortless."

But there's a huge disadvantage here: you have to sacrifice quality for speed. This automated process means there’s no human input, which affects the quality and how long your article can rank.

And content that lacks expertise, human experiences, and unique stories is exactly what Google and AI search are de-prioritizing.

On the other hand, a feature I would highlight is its Topic Clustering. This is important for building topical authority, which helps both Google and AI models recognize you as an expert on a certain subject.

So, while it can generate drafts quickly, you’ll need to put in significant work to add the human element needed for it to perform well.

Key pros of Scalenut

• Cruise mode: It automates the creation of a full-length, SEO-optimized blog post.
• Topic clusters: Automatically groups keywords to help you plan content strategies and build topical authority.
• Content optimizer: Provides a real-time editor with suggestions to improve your content's SEO score based on SERP data.
• AI visibility tool: Track and maximize your brand visibility in AI Search
• Keyword planner: Helps you discover and group keywords to inform content strategy.
• Traffic analyzer: Identifies content with ranking potential on your domain.

Key cons of Scalenut

• Sacrifices quality for speed: The focus on automated speed means the output usually lacks the quality and nuance you need for top-ranking content.
• Lacks human input: The workflow doesn’t really let you add unique expertise, experiences, and perspectives, which are crucial for search performance.
• Potential for generic content: Without significant human oversight and editing, the generated articles may not be differentiated from what's already ranking.

Pricing for Scalenut

• Essential Max: $49/month
• Growth Max: $103/month
• Pro Max: $193/month
• Save up to 50% on annual plans.
• A free trial is available.

ChatGPT: Best for building custom AI workflows and assistants

At this point, I think everyone has used ChatGPT. It's a strong contender for all-purpose AI assistance, but for creating long-form SEO and GEO content, you'll find better results by using its customization features.

This is where the tool really shines for serious content creators.

I would say that the standout feature is the ability to create Custom GPTs. You can build your own specialized chatbots and tailor them for different tasks in your content creation process.

For example, you could create a Custom GPT trained on your brand's voice and style guide to ensure all first drafts are consistent.

The downside is that this requires a huge time investment. You'll have to spend time creating these custom workflows, learning how to prompt them properly, and sometimes even setting up automations with other tools to get the quality you want.

But if you're willing to put in the work, you can build a powerful, personalized AI assistant. As a user notes, "The memory and customization options allow me to tailor ChatGPT to my personal preferences, making every interaction feel more personalized."

ChatGPT's pros

• Allows you to create Custom GPTs for specialized, repeatable workflows.
• Highly versatile for a wide range of tasks beyond just writing.
• Advanced conversational ability that understands natural language prompts.
• Offers access to various powerful models (e.g., GPT-4o).
• Can be tailored to a user's specific style for personalized interactions.
• Streamlines work by integrating advanced tools and customizing responses.

ChatGPT's cons

• Building effective Custom GPTs for quality output is time-consuming.
• Requires a steep learning curve to master prompting for high-quality content.
• May require complex setups and workflow automations with other tools to achieve desired results, still leaving you with that robotic AI slop.

Pricing for ChatGPT

• Free: $0/month
• Go: $4/month
• Plus: $20/month
• Team: $30/user/month
• Enterprise: custom pricing
• Note: Prices per region may differ.

SEOwriting.ai: Best for high-volume, automated content production

If you need to produce a massive volume of SEO articles as quickly as possible, SEOwriting.ai is positioned as the "1-click article factory."

It’s designed for affiliate marketers and bloggers who prioritize speed and simplicity for bulk content generation.

Its features are built for efficiency, from 1-click article generation and bulk creation to direct-to-WordPress publishing. It even includes AI image generation to save you time sourcing visuals.

But you have to be cautious when you go for this level of speed. You will lose out on the quality that's needed for content to actually rank and keep ranking.

This approach lacks human oversight, expertise, and unique points of view, which are what Google and AI models are looking for. People want to hear from people, so you have to be wary of letting AI do everything without a human in the loop.

While one user praised it as a "fast and easy way to write articles," this speed comes at the cost of long-term performance.

Key pros of SEOwriting.ai

• 1-Click article generation: Creates a full, SEO-optimized article from just a single keyword, maximizing speed.
• Bulk content production: Allows users to generate multiple articles at once from a list of keywords.
• Direct WordPress publishing: Features an integration that automatically publishes generated content directly to a WordPress site, saving you time.
• AI image generation: Includes relevant, AI-created images within articles.
• Affiliate content features: Lets you create Amazon product review articles.

Potential cons of SEOwriting.ai

• Lower output quality: The focus on speed and automation sacrifices the quality and nuance that comes from human involvement.
• Lack of human oversight: The automated process lacks the necessary human point-of-view, required for top-ranking, authoritative content.
• Risk of generic content: Without significant editing, the output can be generic "AI slop" that is unlikely to rank well long-term or get cited by other AI models.

Pricing for SEOwriting.ai

• Free Plan: Yes, start for free with 3 articles.
• Starter: $19/month for 50 articles
• Professional: $79/month for 250 articles
• Professional Plus 1: $159/month for 500 articles
• Professional Plus 2: $307/month for 1000 articles

Gemini: Best for deep research and human-like writing

If you’re already deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem, Gemini is a powerful research and writing tool for creating credible, research-backed SEO and GEO content.

Its biggest strength is its superior deep research capability, which provides more comprehensive, fact-checked answers by tapping into Google's vast index of information.

I have also tested it out, and the writing is actually pretty good. Especially with the newer models, Gemini has gotten much better at writing in a human-like style.

This combination of deep research and quality writing is important for creating the kind of content that performs well in search.

But like other large language models, it requires a learning curve. To get really high-quality content instead of robotic-sounding AI slop, you need to know how to prompt it, customize it, and set up more complex workflows.

It’s a powerful tool, but it requires time to get the type of quality you want for your SEO and GEO content.

Gemini pros

• Superior deep research capabilities that provide comprehensive, fact-checked answers by leveraging Google's vast information index.
• Strong, human-like writing style that sounds less robotic compared to other LLMs.
• Seamless integration with Google Workspace apps like Docs, Drive, Gmail, and Meet.
• Large context window allows it to process and analyze extensive documents.
• Acts as a virtual research assistant with tools like NotebookLM to synthesize complex information.
• Provides access to Google's latest and most advanced AI models.

Gemini cons

• You need to learn how to prompt well to achieve high-quality, non-robotic results.
• Needs time-consuming setup of complex, custom workflows for specialized content creation.
• As a generalist tool, it is not specifically tailored for a dedicated SEO/GEO content workflow out of the box.

Pricing for Gemini

• Free: $0/month
• Google AI Pro: $19.99/month
• Google AI Ultra: $249.99/month
• Offers a one-month free trial of Google AI Pro.

Writer: Best for enterprise-grade security and brand governance

Writer is the go-to AI platform for large organizations and regulated industries where brand consistency, security, and compliance are top priorities.

If you are not an enterprise-level company, this tool is not for you. It's specifically built to solve the challenges that come with creating content at scale.

For enterprise companies, I think brand governance is incredibly important, and Writer excels here. It allows you to create customizable style guides and manage terminology to ensure everyone in the company is using the right tone, grammar, and product names.

You can think of it as a guardian of your brand voice across every department.

Its security features are also a major differentiator. It uses proprietary Palmyra LLMs, which are enterprise-grade models that offer greater control. 

It can also securely connect to your company's internal documents and data, allowing the AI to provide more accurate, contextual answers without compromising sensitive information.

As a Writer user mentioned, "WRITER stood out in our due diligence process to meet our privacy and compliance requirements."

Writer pros

• Proprietary Palmyra LLM offers enhanced security and control.
• Customizable style guides enforce brand-specific writing rules, tone, and grammar.
• Terminology management ensures correct use of product names and slogans company-wide.
• Knowledge Graph securely connects to internal company data for contextual and accurate AI output.
• AI Agents can be customized to automate specific workflows across departments.
• Strong focus on meeting enterprise-level privacy and compliance requirements.

Writer cons

• Specifically designed for enterprises, making it unsuitable for individuals or small teams.
• The feature set and pricing structure may be overly complex and expensive for non-enterprise users.

Pricing for Writer

• Pricing information is not publicly available. Interested users must contact their sales team for a custom quote.

Frequently asked questions about Jasper alternatives

You have seen the options, but you probably still have some specific questions based on your team's needs. Let's tackle some of the most common ones from marketers and founders looking for a Jasper alternative.

Choosing the right Jasper alternative for your workflow

The right tool really depends on the specific job you need to get done. 

But I’d advise that if you want to position yourself for the future of search (GEO), you need to prioritize AI tools that’d give you high quality content grounded in research and human POVs. 

You also need tools that will help you track AI visibility, although be cautious since they’re relatively new and there’s no definitive information from AI models on how to track visibility.

Related: 11 Clearscope Alternatives (#1 Avoids Copycat Content)